Legal Opinion

Neville v. Brodrick

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 11, 1955No. Civ. A. No. T-573PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, James G. Neville and Helen Neville, husband and wife, bring this action against the defendant, Lynn R. Brodriek, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Kansas, to recover a refund of certain income taxes allegedly wrongfully assessed and collected from the taxpayers for the taxable years of 1946, 1947 and 1948, while plaintiffs were residents of Topeka, Kansas.1 The principal question is whether certain shares of common capital stock of The Seymour Packing Company of Topeka, Kansas, (herein referred to as Seymour) transferred to each of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bogardus v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Noel v. ParrottCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
  3. Bass v. HawleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  4. Botchford v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  5. Schumacher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. James G. Neville and Helen Neville v. Lynn R. Brodrick, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  2. Watson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API