Legal Opinion

James G. Neville and Helen Neville v. Lynn R. Brodrick, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Kansas

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 26, 1956No. 5273_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Chief Judge.

This was an action instituted by James G. Neville and Helen Neville against Lynn R. Brodriek, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Kansas. James G. Neville and Helen Neville were husband and wife, and Keith Neville was their son. During the years 1946, 1947, and 1948, certain shares of stock issued by Seymour Packing Company, hereinafter referred to as the Seymour Company, were delivered to James G. Neville, hereinafter referred to as the taxpayer; certain shares were delivered to Helen Neville; and certain shares were delivered to Keith Neville. In their…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Commissioner v. LoBueSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Bogardus v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Carragan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. O'malley, Collector of Internal Revenue v. AmesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Amon v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981
  2. Brimm v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  3. Krueger v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
  4. Krueger v. Secretary of TreasurySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
  5. Watson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API