State v. Ansley
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
McNULTY, Judge.
The state appeals pursuant to § 924.071, F.S. 1969, F.S.A. from an order suppressing certain evidence which was seized without a warrant. Testimony was taken on the motion to suppress in which two police officers swore that appellees Ansley and Hopper were stopped for a traffic violation and, thereafter, marijuana was observed in plain sight and seized. Appellee Hopper testified on behalf of both appel-lees denying the traffic violation and also denying that the marijuana was in plain sight. Obviously, it was a swearing match presenting a pure factual matter for the trial judge…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. ParnellSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Talavera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- McIntosh v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Chance v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- State v. Mineo, Circuit Court of the 5th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Lake County1975