Legal Opinion
Arthur Patterson v. Barbara Wagner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 4, 2015No. 13-56080PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
As a teenager, Arthur Patterson was convicted in a South Korean court of destroying evidence in connection with a murder. After serving his prison term, Patterson left Korea for the United States. The South Korean government now seeks to prosecute him for the murder itself and requests that the United States extradite him. Over Patterson’s objections, a magistrate judge certified him for extradition. Patterson filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus to challenge the certification order. The district court denied Patterson’s petition. ■
Patterson argues…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Medellin v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Abbott v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Air France v. SaksSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kulvir Singh Barapind v. Janet Reno, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Sum of $70,990,605District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Yoo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Rana v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Rohm Semiconductor USA, LLC v. Maxpower Semiconductor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Martinez Santoyo v. BoydenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.