Robison v. Hamm
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
The parties will be referred to as their names appeared in the trial court. Plaintiffs in error, who were plaintiffs below, brought this suit (1) for the recovery of usury;- (2) for damages alleged to be due for taking illegal possession of real estate under void receivership; (3) to set aside foreclosure sale; (4) for redemption from foreclosure sale, all as set forth in their petition. (R. 3 to 19, inc.)
To the plaintiffs’ petition, the defendant filed demurrers to each of the alleged causes of action, and likewise a general demurrer to the whole petition. Likewise the defendant demurred on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Clement Mortgage Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Powers v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Ross v. BreeneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- McDougal v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944