Legal Opinion

Anzaldua v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 25, 1956No. 12897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. POPE, Justice.

Sid Richardson filed this suit in. trespass to try title against Urbano and David Anzaldua and others for the recovery of approximately 155 acres of land. Urbano and David Anzaldua answered by way of the ten-year limitation statute, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art.-5510. The jury found the limitations issues for the defendants, but the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. Appellants urge that the, trial court erred because (1) the plaintiff failed to prove title from the sovereignty, or from common source, or by prior possession and (2) contrary…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Burleson v. BurlesonTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Appel v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. W. T. Carter & Brother v. HolmesTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Terrell v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Walker v. MaynardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carter v. BectonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Defterios v. DALLAS BAYOU BEND, LTD., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  3. Harrell v. TilleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Arnold v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Schwarz v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API