Legal Opinion

Save Mart Supermarkets v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 27, 1994No. C-93-1025 SAWPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEIGEL, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND.

Save Mart Supermarkets (“Save Mart”) is a California corporation which operates several retail stores in Northern California. 1 1st Am.Compl., ¶ 1. Underwriters at Lloyd’s and Sphere Drake Insurance PLC (collectively “the London Defendants”) 2 allegedly provided combined Property, Casualty, and Crime Insurance to Save Mart pursuant to Policy No. GUV 1386/190 (“the Policy”), from December 1,1990, to December 1, 1993. 3 In this action, Save Mart seeks a declaration 4 that it is entitled to coverage under the Policy for costs incurred in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. J. C. Penney Casualty Insurance v. M. K.California Supreme Court · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Downey Venture v. LMI Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Nationwide InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Katherine Mazzaferro, Joanne Malec, and Ruth Glahn v. Rli Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. USF Insurance v. Clarendon America InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API