Legal Opinion
Umar Oriental Rugs, Inc. v. Carlson & Carlson, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 29, 2010No. 08-CV-5057 (JFB)(WDW)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge:
Plaintiff Umar Oriental Rugs (hereinafter “Umar” or “plaintiff’) brought this negligence action against defendant Carlson & Carlson (hereinafter “Carlson” or “defendant”). Defendant moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, arguing that the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel bar plaintiffs claims. In addition to moving for summary judgment, defendant has moved this Court to issue sanctions against plaintiff in accordance with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Medcalf v. Thompson Hine LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Araoz v. The New Albany Company, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Araoz v. The New Albany Company, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Bank v. CreditGuard of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Fischer v. Brushy Mountain Bee Farm, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.