Legal Opinion

In re Kerth

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 31, 2003No. 2003-B-1811PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

LPER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter arises from three counts of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Inez Frances Kerth, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Some background information is necessary to understand the long and complicated history of these proceedings. On June 30, 1997, the ODC filed two counts of formal charges against respondent, arising out of the Anglin matter. Count I alleged that respondent failed to diligently pursue her client’s legal matter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. La. State Bar Ass'n v. HinrichsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  3. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. GuidrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  4. In re WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  5. In re NevitteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re: William MageeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2019
  2. In Re: William MageeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API