Legal Opinion
Elite Semiconductor, Inc. v. Anchor Semiconductor, Inc., et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 22, 2026No. 5:20-cv-06846Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 ELITE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., Case No. 5:20-cv-06846-EJD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER ON LIABILITY FOR FEES v. 10 Re: Dkt. No. 486 11 ANCHOR SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Before the Court is Defendants Anchor Semiconductor, Inc. (“Anchor”) and Chenmin 14 Hu’s motion for attorney’s fees. Motion (“Mot.”), ECF No. 486. At a status conference on 15 October 9, 2025, the Court decided to determine liability before addressing any fees. ECF No. 16 491. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- David M. Fink v. James H. Gomez, Director, Diana Carloni NourseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- PRIMUS AUTOMOTIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudolph A. BATARSE, Defendant, Jan C. Nielsen, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Estate of Tucker Ex Rel. Tucker v. InterscopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.