Legal Opinion

State v. Kidd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1982No. 8215SC425PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant’s first assignment of error concerns alleged errors in the charge. He contends that the trial judge erred in giving in structions on the law of self-defense only as to defendant’s assault on Sterling Rumley and in affirmatively charging the jury that they might not consider the law of self-defense as to defendant’s assault on Barry Rumley. He argues that the jury could have logically inferred from his evidence “that he was in apparent danger of death or great bodily harm if he allowed Barry to keep on going to get the gun.” We disagree. Defendant gave the following…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. TannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. DialCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. MizeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. NormanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Brooks v. GoodenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Brooks v. GoodenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API