Laidler v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtVan Nortwick, J.
Euriell Laidler appeals his convictions for two counts of armed robbery with a firearm and one count of aggravated assault with a firearm, contending'that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a continuance and in failing to conduct an adequate Richardson 1 hearing upon being advised of a discovery violation by the State. We agree and, accordingly, reverse and remand for a new trial.
One week before trial, the assistant state attorney advised defense counsel of the name of a previously undisclosed witness, Darryl Ruth, about whom she had just learned. A deposition was scheduled the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- State v. SchoppSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Scipio v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eutsay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- CHARLOT v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Laidler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011