Legal Opinion
Eutsay v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 8, 2012No. 1D11-5689PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
RAY, J.
We grant the State’s Motion for Clarification, withdraw our previous opinion, and substitute the following in its place.
*182Darnell Eutsay, Petitioner, is the defendant in a pending prosecution for first-degree murder. He seeks a writ of certio-rari to quash an order denying his motion to compel discovery and request for sanctions. Because Petitioner has not shown that the order causes a type of injury that is remediable by certiorari, we dismiss his petition. We write to address the portion of his petition concerning the alleged discovery violations.
Petitioner…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. SavageSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Williams v. OkenSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- Scipio v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Boyd v. Pheo, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- State v. LozanoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Goslin v. PreisserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Anthony R. Baker Jr. v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Burris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Burris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.