Legal Opinion · Dissent
Comeaux v. Roy
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 7, 1987No. 86-640Published
1DissentKnoll, Judge
For the reasons stated by the learned trial judge, I disagree with the majority, and adopt the trial court’s reasons for my dissent.
“LSA-R.S. 9:3921 was proposed as an amendment to Act 331 of 1984. The statute is clear in its wording. ‘Notwithstanding any provision in Title III of Code Book III to the contrary, every master or employer is answerable for the damage occasioned by his servant or employee ... Any remission ... or other conventional discharge in favor of the employee for such damages shall be valid as between the damaged creditor and the employee and the employer shall have no…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Finley v. BassLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Francis v. MorialSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Louisiana Gas Service Co. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
- Oil Well Supply Co. v. Red Iron Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
- Procell v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.