Walker v. State

RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Alphonso Walker guilty of possessing cocaine.1 In his sole enumeration of error, Walker contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

*789On appeal from a criminal conviction, Walker is no longer presumed innocent, and we view the evidence in a light most favorable to support the jury’s verdict.2 In so doing, we neither weigh the evidence nor assess witness credibility.3 Viewed in this manner, the record reveals that on April 12, 2002, law enforcement agents working on a drug task force received a tip…