Legal Opinion

Barrino v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 20, 2006No. A06A2087PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Michael Barrino was convicted of possession of MDMA 1 and was sentenced as a recidivist to twenty years, with five to serve. He appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and the trial court’s charge to the jury on circumstantial evidence. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, the defendant is no longer presumed innocent, and the evidence is viewed in a light most favorable to support the jury’s verdict. 2 The appellate court neither weighs the evidence nor assesses witness…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Mims v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Shirley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Helton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Giacini v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fluellen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. Corbin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Fluellen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API