Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1963PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that the Statute of Limitations commenced to run in 1957, when he first was able to discover an injury caused by a 1944 injection of a carcinogenic substance, and that a holding by this court as a matter of law that the actionable injury was sustained prior to that time would deprive appellant of due…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Town Insulation, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Holdridge v. Heyer-Schulte Corp. of Santa BarbaraDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1977
  3. Stephens v. Snyder Clinic Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. Muller v. SturmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Fleishman v. LillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API