Legal Opinion
Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Millar
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 20, 2003No. Civ.A. 02-1408PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
CERCONE, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (“Merrill Lynch”) brings this action under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., to vacate the award of the JAMS Endispute arbitration panel in favor of Douglas T. Millar and Deborah L. Millar (the “Millars”) in the amount of $7,741,305.00. Following eight (8) days of hearing before a panel composed of retired Judge Emery von Kann, retired Judge Stanley Harris, and Attorney Phillip E. Cottone (collectively the “Panel”), the Panel found, inter alia, that Merrill breached…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vitarroz Corp. v. G. Willi Food International Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- ARMSTRONG v. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- Township of Spring v. Standard InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012