Legal Opinion
Getreu v. Bossert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 22, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1099One who seeks a change in visitation is not automatically entitled to a hearing but must make a sufficient evidentiary showing of a material change of circumstances to warrant a hearing (see Matter of Collazo v Collazo, 78 AD3d 1177 [2010]; Matter of Reilly v Reilly, 64 AD3d 660 [2009]; Matter of Rodriguez v Hangartner, 59 AD3d 630, 630-631 [2009]; Matter of Perez v Sepulveda, 51 AD3d 673 [2008]; Matter of Walberg v Rudden, 14 AD3d 572 [2005]). Contrary to the father’s contention, the Family Court properly denied, without a hearing, his motion to modify the “final modified order of parenting…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Perez v. SepulvedaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Rodriguez v. HangartnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Walberg v. RuddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Collazo v. CollazoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Reilly v. ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by3 opinions
- Palmiotti v. PiscitelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Lebovic v. LebovicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Palmiotti v. PiscitelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012