Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Hangartner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 17, 2009PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Lynaugh, J.), dated May 28, 2008, as dismissed, without a hearing, his petition to enforce and modify the visitation provisions of the parties’ judgment of divorce entered December 22, 2006.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof dismissing that branch of the petition which was to enforce the visitation provisions of the judgment of divorce; as so modified, the order is affirmed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Simpson v. PtaszynskaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Gold v. GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. King v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Potente v. WasilewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Nash v. Yablon-NashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Riedel v. RiedelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Grunwald v. GrunwaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Awan v. AwanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Collazo v. CollazoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Reilly v. ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API