Legal Opinion

Amico, Inc. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 26, 1978No. 78-6PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment of the U.S. Customs Court, 79 Cust. Ct. 125, C.D. 4723, 447 F. Supp. 444 (1977), denying the *6importer’s motion for summary judgment and granting1 the Government’s cross-motion for summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The imports were invoiced as “Musical Dancing Couple” or “Dancing Figures.” The bottom portion of each article consists of a musical mechanism or movement, encased in “Lucite,” the box being approximately 2}i inches high with brass corner posts and other fittings. The music box works consist typically of a metal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Lador, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  3. Pukel v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Amico, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  5. Henry Coehler Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Texas Instruments Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  2. United States v. Watches, Watch Parts, Calculators & Misc. PartsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1988
  3. Hermle Black Forest Clocks, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
  4. House of Ideas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API