Legal Opinion
United States v. Watches, Watch Parts, Calculators & Misc. Parts
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided July 27, 1988No. 87-1814-CivPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ATKINS, District Judge.
This cause comes before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. After careful consideration of the motions, responses, and replies, and after a hearing, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff United States of America’s motion is hereby GRANTED and the claimants’ motion is DENIED.
From October of 1985, until March of 1986, United States Customs agents seized shipments containing thousands of counterfeit watches, watch parts, offset plates, and stamping dies. Offset plates are used to place a name or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- William L. Babb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Robert Frederick Huff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Computime, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Tanross Supply Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. LeeDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2006
- Commonwealth v. LooperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2008
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2008