Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Hartford Public Library
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 2, 2013No. CIV. 3:09CV01220 AWTPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge.
In her Second Amended Complaint, plaintiff Maxine Richardson (“Richardson”) asserts claims against defendants Hartford Public Library (the “Library”) and Jane Doe relating to Richardson’s unsuccessful application for employment at the Library. Specifically, Richardson asserts claims in the nature of Quo Warranto (First Cause of Action); for discrimination in violation of Title VII, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (“ADEA”), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Second, Third, and Fourth Causes of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- White Coat Waste Project v. Greater Richmond Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Howell v. Yale UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- White Coat Waste Project v. Greater Richmond Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- White Coat Waste Project v. Greater Richmond Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022