Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re: T.T.E.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 17, 2018No. COA17-648Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partArrowood, Judge

I concur in the majority's opinion that there was insufficient evidence to support juvenile's adjudication for resisting a public officer. However, I respectfully dissent from the majority's holding that there was insufficient evidence to support the adjudication for disorderly conduct.

At the outset, juvenile argues that his petition for disorderly conduct under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-288.4 was defective because it is not clear which subsection of the statute he was charged with violating. The majority did not address this argument because it held that juvenile prevailed on his second…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re HeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. In re S.R.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Matter of WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. In Re SMSCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. In re S.M.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API