Pender v. Foeste
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
COIL, Commissioner.
In their action against Kenneth Foeste and William Jones, Walter Pender and his wife Fay each claimed damages for alleged personal injuries and Walter also sought to recover medical, hospital, and other expenses incurred, and damages for the loss of services and companionship of his wife, and for injury to his truck. Foeste counterclaimed and sought $20,000 for alleged injuries to his person and property. The trial court directed a verdict for William Jones. A jury awarded Walter $4,000, Fay $6,000, and found against Foeste on his counterclaim. Foeste has appealed from the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Yates v. ManchesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Kickham v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Schmittzehe v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Wilson Ex Rel. Wilson v. ShumateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Hoffman v. Illinois Terminal Railroad CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Brown v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Fahy v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Parsons Construction Co. v. Missouri Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Barlow v. ThornhillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Anderson v. WeltyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.