Legal Opinion

People v. Maltz

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1971No. Crim. 4146PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

By a complaint filed in the Municipal Court of the South Orange County Judicial District, defendant was accused of possession of restricted dangerous drugs—LSD (count I, Health & Saf. Code, § 11910) and furnishing and sale of restricted dangerous drugs—LSD (count II, Health & Saf. Code, § 11912). After a preliminary hearing, defendant was held to answer, and an information, consisting of two counts, was filed in the Orange County Superior Court charging defendant with these offenses. Defendant’s motion to set aside the information made pursuant to Penal Code section 995 was…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. LaiwaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. RichardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. People v. LimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API