Legal Opinion
People v. Richard
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 20, 1981No. Crim. 35507PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JEFFERSON (Bernard), J. *
By indictment, defendants Dean Pic’l, an attorney, and Randall James Martin were charged with committing a number of felony offenses. In count I, defendants were charged with conspiracy, a felony, in violation of Penal Code section 182. It was alleged that defendants conspired to commit the crime of extortion, in violation of Penal Code section 520, the crime of bribing a witness, in violation of Penal Code section 136 1/2, the crime of attempting to induce a witness to withhold true testimony, in violation of Penal Code section 137, the crime of compounding a…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. SullyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. BelmontesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. HawthorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. BacigalupoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.