Legal Opinion

Rea v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 5, 1925No. 176PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.

Appellees instituted this suit against appellants c¡n a note for $350. Appellants, for answer, alleged that the note was executed in payment of a real estate commission to appellees for effecting the exchange . of certain real estate belonging to appellants, and alleged that in said real estate trade ap-pellees fraudulently misrepresented the value of the land which appellants were trading for, and alleged that the note was void because appellees, as real estate agents, were claiming a commission from both sides of the real estate trade without the knowledge or consent of appellants. A trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hunter, Evans & Co. v. LaniusTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Johnson v. BinghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. National Bank of Cleburne v. CarperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Johnson v. BinghamTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  5. Adams v. Overland Automobile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dancy v. PeytonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Murphy v. BainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Security Union Ins. Co. v. GullettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Wichita Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. LevineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. National Mut. Ben. Ass'n v. AaronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API