Rea v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.
Appellees instituted this suit against appellants c¡n a note for $350. Appellants, for answer, alleged that the note was executed in payment of a real estate commission to appellees for effecting the exchange . of certain real estate belonging to appellants, and alleged that in said real estate trade ap-pellees fraudulently misrepresented the value of the land which appellants were trading for, and alleged that the note was void because appellees, as real estate agents, were claiming a commission from both sides of the real estate trade without the knowledge or consent of appellants. A trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hunter, Evans & Co. v. LaniusTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Johnson v. BinghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- National Bank of Cleburne v. CarperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Johnson v. BinghamTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Adams v. Overland Automobile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dancy v. PeytonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Murphy v. BainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Security Union Ins. Co. v. GullettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Wichita Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. LevineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- National Mut. Ben. Ass'n v. AaronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.