Legal Opinion

Adams v. Overland Automobile Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1918No. 7900PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Dallas County Court; T. A. Work, Judge. Action by the Overland Automobile Company against H. H-. Adams. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.

The appellee sued the appellant April 14, 1915, on a promissory note for the sum of $299, hearing interest at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum, and providing to pay an additional 10 per cent, of the full amount of the note as attorney’s fees, if same was placed in the hands of an attorney for collection. The appellant answered May 4, 1915, admitting the execution of the note, that it was past due and unpaid, and that appellant had refused to pay it or any part thereof. The appellant alleged that the note was given in part payment for an automobile sold to him by ap-pellee as a new car, of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hunter, Evans & Co. v. LaniusTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. National Bank of Cleburne v. CarperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gaylord Container Division of Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. H. Rouw Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Farmers & Merchants Savings Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Rea v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Goodwin v. Abilene State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Walker-Smith Co. v. PounsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API