Legal Opinion

Peloza v. Cuevas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 6, 2012No. 05-10-01388-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice LANG-MIERS.

Appellants John H. Peloza, M.D. and Center for Spine Care filed this interlocutory appeal from an order denying their motion to dismiss in a health care liability lawsuit. The issue we address is whether appellee Bright Star Cuevas was required to serve a new expert report to address new allegations in her amended pleading. We conclude that she was required to serve an expert report addressing some but not all of the new allegations. Consequently, we reverse the trial court’s order in part and affirm the order in part.

Background

Cuevas, a registered nurse,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. American Transitional Care Centers of Texas, Inc. v. PalaciosTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Bowie Memorial Hospital v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. City of Garland v. Dallas Morning NewsTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re JordenTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Crites v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. Helson Pacheco-Serrant, M.D. v. Carmen Munoz, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2018
  3. Thelma Hackworth and Caryl Neal, as Natural Parents I Survivors for Carylette DeShun Neal v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, D/B/A/ Fresenius South Oak Cliff Dialysis Center And Jane/John Doe, Individually, and as Owners'/Employees' of Fresenius Medical Care North America, D/B/A/ Fresenius South Oak Cliff Dialysis Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API