Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Corizon Health Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 1, 2022No. 2:22-cv-10589Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM KELLY, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:22-cv-10589 v. DISTRICT JUDGE MARK A. GOLDSMITH CORIZON HEALTH INC., MAGISTRATE JUDGE PATRICIA T. MORRIS et al., Defendants. / ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION (ECF No. 25)1 I. Introduction After William Kelley initiated this suit, Corizon Health split into two corporations. The first corporation, CHS TX, obtained all of Corizon’s employees, facilities, equipment, secured creditors, and active contracts. The second corporation kept Corizon’s name, but only inherited a…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API