Legal Opinion
United States v. Jackson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 15, 1997No. So 97 Cr. 121(BSJ)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
JONES, District Judge.
Pending is a motion by defendant Autumn Jackson, in which co-defendant Yosi Medina joins, to dismiss the Superseding Indictment pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(2). Specifically, Jackson argues that 18 U.S.C. § 875(d) (“ § 875(d)”) and § 155.05.2(e)(v) of the New York Penal Law (“ § 155.05”) are unconstitutionally over-broad and vague on their face and as applied in this case. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion.
BACKGROUND
On February 27, 1997, the Grand Jury returned a superseding indictment charging Jackson,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Autumn Jackson, Boris Sabas, Also Known as Boris Shmulevich, and Jose Medina, Also Known as Yosi MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Dawkins v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2007
- People v. FeldmanNew York Supreme Court · 2005