Legal Opinion

Barcia v. Barcia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Family Court did not err in denying her motion pursuant to Family Court Act § 842 (f) for an award of counsel fees in the sum of $5,413.50 on the ground that the respondent is the financially superior spouse (see Family Ct Act § 842 [f]; see also Matter of Amy Cohen L. v Howard N.L., 222 AD2d 677 [1995]; Merola v Merola, 146 AD2d 611, 612 [1989]; Matter of Leffingwell v Leffingwell, 86 AD2d 929, 930 [1982]; cf. Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a], [b]; § 238; Family Ct Act § 438 [a]; §§ 536, 641; Cohen v Cohen, 73 AD3d 832, 834 [2010]), or based on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merola v. MerolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Leffingwell v. LeffingwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Cohen L. v. Howard N. L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Cohen v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Christy v. ChristyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API