Barcia v. Barcia
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Family Court did not err in denying her motion pursuant to Family Court Act § 842 (f) for an award of counsel fees in the sum of $5,413.50 on the ground that the respondent is the financially superior spouse (see Family Ct Act § 842 [f]; see also Matter of Amy Cohen L. v Howard N.L., 222 AD2d 677 [1995]; Merola v Merola, 146 AD2d 611, 612 [1989]; Matter of Leffingwell v Leffingwell, 86 AD2d 929, 930 [1982]; cf. Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a], [b]; § 238; Family Ct Act § 438 [a]; §§ 536, 641; Cohen v Cohen, 73 AD3d 832, 834 [2010]), or based on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Merola v. MerolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Leffingwell v. LeffingwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Cohen L. v. Howard N. L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Cohen v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Christy v. ChristyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020