Legal Opinion

Vontress v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 30, 2014No. 102,904PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nuss, C.J.:

Damon Vontress contends the district court and Court of Appeals both erred in denying his motion for habeas relief as untimely under K.S.A. 60-1507(1). While admitting his motion was untimely filed after the 1-year limit in K.S.A. 60-1507(f)(l), Vontress argues the summaiy denial of his motion caused “a manifest injustice” which entitled him to an extension of the time limit under K.S.A. 60-1507(f)(2). Both lower courts rejected this argument with varying rationales. We granted review to clarify the manifest injustice standard in K.S.A.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Yang v. ArchuletaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Gibson v. KlingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Miller v. MarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. KeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. Beauclair v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. State v. Spencer Gifts, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  4. Neighbor v. Westar Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. White v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API