Legal Opinion

Bedford v. American Aluminum & Specialty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, George P. Bedford, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 29th day of March, 1900, denying his motion for an injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the Court

Rumsey, J.:

It appears that the stock of the American Aluminum and Specialty Company consisted of 400 shares, of which upon the original organization the plaintiff was the owner of- 200, thus substantially giving him a veto upon any change' in the organization of the company. His complaint alleges that the plaintiff and William Hillman and George W. Hillman were the directors of the. company; that after the plaintiff had received his certificate for the 200 shares he surrendered it to the other directors for the purpose of having other certificates made out of smaller, denominations; that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cushman v. Thayer Manufacturing Jewelry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Slayback v. RaymondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  2. Travis v. Knox Terpezone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Kennedy v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. Jahn v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. Powers v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API