Legal Opinion

People v. Perico

Nassau County District Court

Decided April 7, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard A. La Pera, J.

Defendants’ (Perico and Andriano) motions for an order dismissing the within information on the ground that the prosecution is untimely, pursuant to CPL 30.10, and on the ground that the information is insufficient as a matter of law, pursuant to CPL 100.15, is granted.

*962According to the within information, on December 19, 1985, the defendants unlawfully violated and failed to comply with the provisions of Workers’ Compensation Law §§ 50 and 52. Violation of Workers’ Compensation Law § 52 is punishable as a misdemeanor and therefore, CPL 30.10 (2) (c)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Reibman v. Warden of the County JailAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. People v. DicksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. People v. BlakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. People v. LohnesNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. PilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. State v. TimoteoHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. TimoteoHawaii Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API