Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Timoteo

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1997No. 17987Published

1DissentRamil, Justice

I disagree with the approach taken by the majority in this case. In my view, our prior case law, our statutory scheme, the policies underlying statutes of limitations, and the policies underlying included offense instructions argue in favor of a different approach. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

For the sake of clarity, I believe that the issue presented in this case, i.e., the effect of the statute of limitations on included offenses, should be separated into two subsidiary issues: (1) whether the statute of limitations for an included offense can be “waived” and (2) whether an included…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Commonwealth v. DarushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API