Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Arnold
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 23, 2005No. 04-5384PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The court delivered a PER CURIAM opinion.
SUTTON, J. (pp. 407-12), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
AMENDED OPINION
2Per curiam
This matter is before the Court on the government’s petition for rehearing en banc. Upon consideration of the relevant briefs and the record, we vacate our prior opinion, United States v. Arnold, 410 F.3d 895 (6th Cir.2005), and replace it with this amended opinion.
On November 5, 2003, Defendant-Appellant, Joseph Arnold (“Arnold”), was convicted after a trial by jury in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee of possession of a firearm by a…
3Cases cited64 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Yervin K. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. John Joseph Coffee, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. CoffeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Kenneth SadlerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022