Horner v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILL J. CORNELIUS, Commissioner.
Appellant was convicted of murder with malice and assessed punishment at seventy-nine years confinement. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.
The first ground of error urges that a mistrial should have been declared when the prosecuting attorney made the following comment in his jury summation at the guilt-innocence stage of the trial:
“Mr. Pool talks about, to you, everybody who testified in this case but his own client. He makes no reference to his actions out there on that night.”
Appellant’s motion for mistrial was denied.
For comments to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Washburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Rice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Rice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Lenzi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Parra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
- Clanton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- State v. RollinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- Porth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. CrummSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.