Legal Opinion

John Deere Harvester Works v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 23, 1994No. 3-92-0981WCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woodward

Claimant, Larry Adkins, filed an application for adjustment of claim pursuant to the Workers’ Occupational Diseases Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 48, par. 172.36 et seq.). Therein he alleged loss of hearing in both ears arising out of and in the course of employment with John Deere Harvester Works (the employer). Claimant did not allege work-related hearing loss beyond August 3, 1987, at which time he began to use hearing protection. The arbitrator found that claimant had sustained a 27.3% loss of hearing in his left ear and 15.17% loss of hearing in his right ear.

On review, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hux v. RabenIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Wozniak v. SegalIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Diversified Computer Services, Inc. v. Town of YorkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Kocik v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Young v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Application of the County TreasurerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API