Legal Opinion

State v. Holdcroft

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2013No. 2012-1325 and 2012-1441PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Holdcroft, 137 Ohio St.3d 526,

2013-Ohio-5014.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HOLDCROFT, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Holdcroft, 137 Ohio St.3d 526,

2013-Ohio-5014.] Trial court does not have authority to resentence a defendant for purpose of adding postrelease control as sanction for a particular offense after the defendant has already served the prison term for that offense. (Nos. 2012-1325 and 2012-1441—Submitted June 4, 2013—Decided November 20, 2013.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Wyandot County, No. 16-10-13,

2012-Ohio-3066.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
State v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 2008
State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2010
State v. SaxonOhio Supreme Court · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

State ex rel. Randlett v. LynchOhio Supreme Court · 2022