Legal Opinion
Eisenberg v. Wall
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 12, 2009No. Civil Action 07-10087-NMGPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
This is an action brought under the federal and state civil rights statutes, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and M.G.L. c. 12, § 111. The pro se plaintiff, David W. Eisenberg (“Eisenberg”), alleges that the Town of Burlington (“the Town”) and the Burlington Board of Health (“the Board of Health” or “the Board” and together with the Town, “the municipal defendants”) through their various officers (named as individual defendants), violated his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and the corollary provisions of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maldonado v. Municipality of BarcelonetaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
- Ace Black Ranches, LLC v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022