Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for reinstatement in office.

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Upon the agreed statement of facts, I. think the plaintiff is entitled to judgment. He was suspended from his office as chief inspector in the bureau of buildings on July 15, 1900, “ pending the preparation of charges,” which charges he was in*454formed would be “ submitted at the earliest possible moment.” He was paid his full salary for July, but after July thirty-first and until December twenty-second, his salary was withheld. He was not furnished with a copy of the charges against him until November 26, 1909, a lapse of four months, despite continuous application for same. He was not allowed…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Everitt v. Teachers' Retirement BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API