Legal Opinion

Dalrymple v. Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 14506PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARSH, District Judge.

On May 14, 1959, a judgment of dismissal was entered in the above entitled action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with Local Rule 5-II. The matter here under consideration is plaintiff’s motion to set aside that judgment.

On April 12, 1956, the- complaint was filed for Walter Dalrymple by his retained counsel, S. Eldridge Sampliner, Esq., of Cleveland, Ohio. It demanded damages pursuant to the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, maintenance and cure and a jury trial. On March 6, 1958, an order fixing pretrial procedure was entered by Judge Mcllvaine, and a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Forsyth v. HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Teal v. King Farms Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Sylvia Agronofsky, Helen Agronofsky and Abraham Agronofsky v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Van Bronkhorst v. Safeco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. Lynch v. Meridian Hill Studio Apts., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. William Link v. Wabash Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  4. James L. Cherry and Mildred F. Cherry v. Brown-Frazier-Whitney, PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  5. Farinelli v. CampagnaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API