Foster v. Phinizy
Supreme Court of Georgia
Intervention. Before Judge Lewis. Morgan superior court. February 29, 1904.
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
Mrs. Turnbull and three Fosters were tenants in common of a tract of land, in which each was entitled to an undivided one-fourth interest. It was agreed that F. C. and L. H. Foster should cultivate the land and make certain improvements, and from the rents and profits reimburse themselves for the sums which they might thus expend. Mrs. Turnbull filed an application for partition, and the two Fosters above referred to filed a plea, in which they set forth the agreement, that they had made improvements, and that they had not been reimbursed therefor. While this case was pending Phinizy became…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Turnbull v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Mathis v. FordhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Jones v. McNealySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Coston v. DudleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
3Cited by8 opinions
- Davenport v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Rigdon v. Walker Sales & Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Avery & Co. v. SorrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Rawlins v. BusbeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- McMillen v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.