Legal Opinion

State v. Dugan

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 11, 2001No. 83,277PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

Peter J. Dugan appeals the trial court’s determination that the State v. Ortiz, 230 Kan. 733, 640 P.2d 1255 (1982), exceptions to the requirement of a timely filed notice of appeal do not apply in this case. On appeal, Dugan argues that the trial court erred in making this determination. We disagree and affirm.

Dugan pled guilty to robbery as the result of a plea agreement with die State. On May 26, 1998, Dugan was sentenced. At sentencing, Dugan’s attorney requested a dispositional departure, noting that Dugan fell within a presumptive incarceration box on the sentencing grid. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. State v. FloresSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. Blank v. ChawlaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Golconda Screw, Inc. v. West Bottoms Ltd.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MaishCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. State v. PhinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. State v. HunzikerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. State v. HarpSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API