Legal Opinion
Grover v. Central Benefits National Life Insurance
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided February 2, 1995No. Civ. A. 3:94-0020PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending is the Defendant Central Benefits National Life Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Based upon the absence of a genuine issue of material fact and the law, the Court GRANTS the motion.
Under Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment is proper only:
“If the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hebra A. Berry v. Ciba-Geigy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bertoni v. Stock Bldg. SupplyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008