Legal Opinion

Smith v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 1963No. Civ. 27287PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered after the trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment in an action for personal injuries. Plaintiff, a 15-year old minor, sustained the injury when he attempted to hitch a ride on defendant’s train, lost his hold and fell underneath a moving freight ear.

The chronology of significant events is as follows:

On March 29, 1962, plaintiff filed his complaint for personal injuries. Therein it was alleged in substance that defendant owned and operated a railroad right of way through the City of Norwalk; that at the time of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tell v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Martelli v. PollockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Herrera v. Southern Pacific Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Gutirrez v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Security First National Bank v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frazier, Dame, Doherty, Parrish & Hanawalt v. Boccardo, Blum, Lull, Niland, Teerlink & BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Alston v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
  3. Franklin v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Beard v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Durham v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API