Legal Opinion
Paul Kinnison v. City of San Antonio
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 31, 2012No. 11-50333UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
The City of San Antonio, Texas, (the “City”) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Paul Chance Kinnison on his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and subsequent jury-determined damages award. On the state of the record, we conclude that Kin-nison did not establish that the City’s actions were unreasonable as a matter of law. We therefore VACATE the judgment below and REMAND for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I. Facts and Procedural History
On April 8, 2008, Alice Guajardo, a Dangerous Premises Inspector…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Houston v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- RBIII, L.P. v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Amaya v. City of San AntonioDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2013
- Herrera v. Santa Fe Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Aaron Wolber v. Round Rock Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.