Legal Opinion

United States v. Ross

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 24, 1996No. ACM S29022PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PEARSON, Senior Judge:

In a litigated trial, court members convicted appellant of using marijuana, based on a positive urinalysis result. The court sentenced her to a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to E-l, which the convening authority approved. Appellant contends we should reverse because the military judge erred in admitting impeachment evidence of her prior court-martial conviction for using marijuana. See Mil. R. Evid. 609(a). We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

Appellant testified she did not use marijuana on or about the date charged, July 22, 1994, and was “surprised”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. DiazUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. LeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  3. United States v. BarrowUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  4. United States v. BrenizerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  5. United States v. DraytonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. RuppelUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  2. United States v. MatthewsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  3. United States v. Major KENDALL M. AMAZAKI, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API